Worth checking before choosing or changing a subscription. Handig om te checken voordat je een abonnement kiest of wijzigt.
How we’re responding to The New York Times’ data demands in order to protect user privacy How we’re responding to The New York Times’ data demands in order to protect user privacy
Title: How we’re responding to The New York Times’ data demands in order to protect user privacy Title: How we’re responding to The New York Times’ data demands in order to protect user privacy
Quick editorial signal Snelle redactionele duiding
- Track this as a OpenAI update, not just a standalone headline. Bekijk dit als OpenAI-update, niet alleen als losse headline.
- Check plan details before changing subscriptions or advising a team. Controleer plandetails voordat je abonnementen wijzigt of een team adviseert.
- Likely worth revisiting after people have used the release in practice. Waarschijnlijk de moeite waard om opnieuw te bekijken zodra mensen het in praktijk gebruiken.
How we’re responding to The New York Times’ data demands in order to protect user privacy | OpenAI
Listen to article
_Update on October 22, 2025:_
_After months of litigation, we are no longer under a legal order to retain consumer ChatGPT and API content indefinitely. Our obligations under the earlier order ended on September 26, 2025._
* _Deleted ChatGPT conversationsandTemporary Chatswill be automatically deleted from our systems within30 days_(opens in a new window)_._
* _API datawill also be automatically deleted after30 days._(opens in a new window)
_The New York Times continues to demand that OpenAI keep a specific set of user data from April-September 2025. So while we’re no longer required to indefinitely retain new user data going forward or any conversations originating from the European Economic Area, Switzerland, or the United Kingdom, we will securely store limited historical April–September 2025 user data. It remains locked down, accessible only to a small, audited OpenAI legal and security team, and can’t be used for anything other than meeting legal obligations. This datawill not be turned overto the New York Times, the Court, or anyone else at this time. We will continue to fight these overreaches by the New York Times and defend long-standing privacy norms._
Trust and privacy are at the core of our products.
We give you tools to control your data—including easy opt-outs and permanent removal of deleted ChatGPT chats(opens in a new window) and API content from OpenAI’s systems within 30 days.
The New York Times and other plaintiffs have made a sweeping and unnecessary demand in their baseless lawsuit against us: retain consumer ChatGPT and API customer data indefinitely.
This fundamentally conflicts with the privacy commitments we have made to our users. It abandons long-standing privacy norms and weakens privacy protections.
We strongly believe this is an overreach by the New York Times. We’re continuing to appeal this order so we can keep putting your trust and privacy first.
—Brad Lightcap, COO, OpenAI
Why are The New York Times and other plaintiffs asking for this?
* The New York Times is suing OpenAI. As part of their baseless lawsuit, they’ve recently asked the court to force us to retain all user content indefinitely going forward, based on speculation that they might find something that supports their case.
* We strongly believe this is an overreach. It risks your privacy without actually helping resolve the lawsuit. That’s why we’re fighting it.
Is my data impacted?
* Yes, if you have a ChatGPT Free, Plus, Pro, and Team subscription or if you use the OpenAI API (without a Zero Data Retention agreement).
* This does not impact ChatGPT Enterprise or ChatGPT Edu customers.
* This does not impact API customers who are using Zero Data Retention endpoints under our ZDR amendment.
What have you done to challenge this order to date?
* From the outset, we argued that the plaintiffs’ request to preserve “all output data” was vastly overbroad and conflicted with our privacy commitments. We filed a motion asking the Magistrate Judge to reconsider the preservation order, highlighting that indefinite retention of user data breaches industry norms and our own policies.
* When we appeared before the Magistrate Judge on May 27, the Court clarified that ChatGPT Enterprise is excluded from preservation.
* We have also appealed this order with the District Court Judge.
What if I am a business customer and I have a Zero Data Retention agreement?
* You are not impacted. If you are a business customer that uses our Zero Data Retention (ZDR) API, we never retain the prompts you send or the answers we return. Because it is not stored, this court order doesn’t affect that data.
If I delete my data from ChatGPT, will it still be retained under this order?
* The New York Times is demanding that we retain even deleted ChatGPT chats(opens in a new window) and API content that would typically be automatically removed from our systems within 30 days.
How will you store my data and who can access it?
How will you store my data and who can access it?
* The content covered by the court order is stored separately in a secure system. It’s protected under legal hold, meaning it can’t be accessed or used for purposes other than meeting legal obligations.
Will this data be shared with the New York Times, other plaintiffs, or anyone else?
Will this data be shared with the New York Times, other plaintiffs, or anyone else?
* This data is not automatically shared with The New York Times or anyone else. It’s locked under a separate legal hold, meaning it’s securely stored and can only be accessed under strict legal protocols.
How long will OpenAI keep this data? Is there a known end date or review period for the court order?
How long will OpenAI keep this data? Is there a known end date or review period for the court order?
Does this court order violate GDPR or my rights under European or other privacy laws?
Does this court order violate GDPR or my rights under European or other privacy laws?
Does this change your training policies?
Does this change your training policies?
* Business customers: We don’t train our models on business data by default, and this court order does not change that.
Will you keep us updated?
Will you keep us updated?
What are your data retention policies?
What are your data retention policies?
* ChatGPT Free, Plus, Pro(opens in a new window): When you delete a chat (or your account), the chat is removed from your account immediately and scheduled for permanent deletion from OpenAI systems within 30 days, unless we are required to retain it for legal or security reasons or as described here(opens in a new window).
* ChatGPT Team: Each of your end users controls whether their conversations are retained. Any deleted or unsaved conversations are removed from our systems within 30 days, unless we are legally required to retain them.
* ChatGPT Enterprise and ChatGPT Edu: Your workspace admins control how long your customer content is retained. Any deleted conversations are removed from our systems within 30 days, unless we are legally required to retain them.
* API: Business customers who build on top of our API control how long customer content is retained for application state based on the endpoints they use and their configurations (see here(opens in a new window)). After 30 days, API inputs and outputs are removed from OpenAI logs, unless we are legally required to retain them.
* Zero Data Retention API: If a business customer is using Zero Data Retention endpoints, inputs and outputs are never logged and are not retained for application state.
Help shape what we cover next Help bepalen wat we hierna volgen
Anonymous feedback, no frontend account needed. Anonieme feedback, zonder front-end account.
More from OpenAI Meer van OpenAI
All updates Alle updatesOpenAI available at FedRAMP Moderate OpenAI available at FedRAMP Moderate
Expanding secure AI for government. Expanding secure AI for government.
Choco automates food distribution with AI agents Choco automates food distribution with AI agents
Using OpenAI APIs, Choco processes millions of orders, reducing manual work and enabling always-on operations across global food supply chains. Using OpenAI APIs, Choco processes millions of orders, reducing manual work and enabling always-on operations across global food supply chains.
An open-source spec for Codex orchestration: Symphony. An open-source spec for Codex orchestration: Symphony.
Title: An open-source spec for Codex orchestration: Symphony. Title: An open-source spec for Codex orchestration: Symphony.
The next phase of the Microsoft OpenAI partnership The next phase of the Microsoft OpenAI partnership
Amended agreement provides long-term clarity. Amended agreement provides long-term clarity.