← Back to OpenAI updates ← Terug naar OpenAI-updates
OpenAI ARTICLE ARTIKEL 20 June 2024 20 juni 2024

Improved Techniques for Training Consistency Models Improved Techniques for Training Consistency Models

Title: Improved Techniques for Training Consistency Models Title: Improved Techniques for Training Consistency Models

Article details Artikelgegevens
AI maker AI-maker OpenAI Type Type Article Artikel Published Gepubliceerd 20 June 2024 20 juni 2024 Updates Updates Videos Video's View original article Bekijk origineel artikel
Why it matters Waarom dit telt

Quick editorial signal Snelle redactionele duiding

2 min
Impact Impact

Relevant if you build with AI tools, APIs, or coding agents. Relevant als je bouwt met AI-tools, API's of coding agents.

Audience Voor wie Developers Developers
Level Niveau Expert Expert
  • Track this as a OpenAI update, not just a standalone headline. Bekijk dit als OpenAI-update, niet alleen als losse headline.
  • Useful for builders who need to understand API, coding, or workflow changes. Nuttig voor bouwers die API-, code- of workflowwijzigingen willen begrijpen.
  • Likely worth revisiting after people have used the release in practice. Waarschijnlijk de moeite waard om opnieuw te bekijken zodra mensen het in praktijk gebruiken.
model apps developers creative

Improved Techniques for Training Consistency Models | OpenAI

Skip to main content

[](https://openai.com/)

* Research

* Products

* Business

* Developers

* Company

* Foundation(opens in a new window)

Log inTry ChatGPT(opens in a new window)

Try ChatGPT(opens in a new window)Login

OpenAI

June 20, 2024

Publication

Improved techniques for training consistency models

Read paper (opens in a new window)

Consistency models are a nascent family of generative models that can sample high quality data in one step without the need for adversarial training. Current consistency models achieve optimal sample quality by distilling from pre-trained diffusion models and employing learned metrics such as LPIPS. However, distillation limits the quality of consistency models to that of the pre-trained diffusion model, and LPIPS causes undesirable bias in evaluation. To tackle these challenges, we present improved techniques for consistency training, where consistency models learn directly from data without distillation. We delve into the theory behind consistency training and identify a previously overlooked flaw, which we address by eliminating Exponential Moving Average from the teacher consistency model. To replace learned metrics like LPIPS, we adopt Pseudo-Huber losses from robust statistics. Additionally, we introduce a lognormal noise schedule for the consistency training objective, and propose to double total discretization steps every set number of training iterations. Combined with better hyperparameter tuning, these modifications enable consistency models to achieve FID scores of 2.51 and 3.25 on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet 64×64 respectively in a single sampling step. These scores mark a 3.5× and 4× improvement compared to prior consistency training approaches. Through two-step sampling, we further reduce FID scores to 2.24 and 2.77 on these two datasets, surpassing those obtained via distillation in both one-step and two-step settings, while narrowing the gap between consistency models and other state-of-the-art generative models.

OpenAI

June 20, 2024

Authors

Yang Song, Prafulla Dhariwal

Read paper (opens in a new window)

Loading…

Consistency models are a nascent family of generative models that can sample high quality data in one step without the need for adversarial training. Current consistency models achieve optimal sample quality by distilling from pre-trained diffusion models and employing learned metrics such as LPIPS. However, distillation limits the quality of consistency models to that of the pre-trained diffusion model, and LPIPS causes undesirable bias in evaluation. To tackle these challenges, we present improved techniques for consistency training, where consistency models learn directly from data without distillation. We delve into the theory behind consistency training and identify a previously overlooked flaw, which we address by eliminating Exponential Moving Average from the teacher consistency model. To replace learned metrics like LPIPS, we adopt Pseudo-Huber losses from robust statistics. Additionally, we introduce a lognormal noise schedule for the consistency training objective, and propose to double total discretization steps every set number of training iterations. Combined with better hyperparameter tuning, these modifications enable consistency models to achieve FID scores of 2.51 and 3.25 on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet 64×64 respectively in a single sampling step. These scores mark a 3.5× and 4× improvement compared to prior consistency training approaches. Through two-step sampling, we further reduce FID scores to 2.24 and 2.77 on these two datasets, surpassing those obtained via distillation in both one-step and two-step settings, while narrowing the gap between consistency models and other state-of-the-art generative models.

* Generative Models

* Software & Engineering

Authors

Yang Song, Prafulla Dhariwal

Help shape what we cover next Help bepalen wat we hierna volgen

Anonymous feedback, no frontend account needed. Anonieme feedback, zonder front-end account.

More from OpenAI Meer van OpenAI

All updates Alle updates

Gemini komt eraan